Grand Theft Auto

Written By Davis Hewitt

Understanding Vehicle Theft in California (Vehicle Code § 10851)

If you’ve been charged with vehicle theft in California, it’s important to understand exactly what the law says—and what it doesn’t. California Vehicle Code § 10851 is broader than many people realize, and that breadth often creates opportunities for a strong defense.

What Does Vehicle Code § 10851 Prohibit?

Under California Vehicle Code § 10851, it is illegal to:

Take or drive a vehicle that does not belong to you, without the owner’s consent, and with the intent to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner of possession or title.

Key Elements the Prosecution Must Prove

To secure a conviction, the prosecution must establish:

  • You took or drove someone else’s vehicle

  • The owner did not consent

  • You intended to deprive the owner of possession or ownership (even temporarily)

Each of these elements is contestable, and in many cases, the prosecution struggles to prove one or more beyond a reasonable doubt.

“Taking” vs. “Driving”

One of the most misunderstood aspects of § 10851 is that you don’t actually have to be the person who initially stole the car. Simply driving a vehicle you knew (or should have known) was taken without permission can be enough.

That distinction often becomes a focal point in defense strategy—particularly in cases involving multiple individuals or unclear timelines.

Is Vehicle Theft a Felony or a Misdemeanor?

A charge under § 10851 is known as a “wobbler,” meaning it can be filed as either:

  • Misdemeanor: Up to 1 year in county jail

  • Felony: 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in county jail

The charging decision typically depends on factors like:

  • The value of the vehicle

  • The defendant’s criminal history

  • Whether there was damage or additional criminal conduct involved

Common Defenses to Vehicle Theft Charges

Every case is unique, but some common defenses include:

  • Lack of intent: You did not intend to deprive the owner of the vehicle

  • Consent: You had permission (or reasonably believed you had permission)

  • Mistaken identity: You were not the person who took or drove the vehicle

  • Insufficient evidence: The prosecution cannot prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt

Because § 10851 cases often rely heavily on circumstantial evidence, careful analysis of the facts can expose weaknesses in the prosecution’s theory.

Why Early Intervention Matters

Vehicle theft charges can carry serious consequences, including jail time, fines, and a lasting criminal record. Early involvement by a defense attorney can make a meaningful difference—whether by challenging the evidence, negotiating reduced charges, or positioning the case for dismissal.

Final Thoughts

California’s vehicle theft law is intentionally broad, but that doesn’t mean every charge is justified or provable. Understanding the nuances of California Vehicle Code § 10851 is the first step in building an effective defense.

If you or someone you know is facing a vehicle theft charge, getting informed—and getting representation—should be the immediate priority.

Davis Hewitt
Next

Indecent Exposure Exposed